๐Ÿ“Š Project Finance Viewpoint: Structuring a Large Corporate Loan for Hydropower Projects Like XPCL A Case Study

Hydropower projects such as Xayaburi Power Company Limited (XPCL) present a unique opportunity for long-term infrastructure lenders, particularly under the project finance model. This model emphasizes asset-backed, non-recourse or limited-recourse lending, supported by stable revenue from contracted offtake agreements.

For large-scale corporate loans aimed at energy infrastructure, XPCL’s structure provides a relevant case study in balancing operational risk, cash flow forecasting, sovereign exposure, and capital structuring.

๐Ÿ“Œ Project Finance Fundamentals

Project finance is typically used for capital-intensive projects with long payback periods—like power plants, toll roads, ports, and pipelines. Lenders focus on:

  • Predictable revenue streams from long-term contracts
  • Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) to isolate project risk
  • Limited recourse to sponsors (except during construction)
  • Detailed risk allocation across stakeholders
  • Covenant-heavy agreements with built-in protections

XPCL embodies many of these characteristics and provides valuable insights into how hydropower projects can be financed through large corporate loans within a project finance framework.

๐Ÿ’ก Overview of XPCL Project Finance Structure

XPCL was structured as a project company (SPV) with

๐Ÿงพ Credit Underwriting Considerations for Lenders

When evaluating a large corporate loan for a project like XPCL, lenders and credit committees will review the following:

1. Revenue Certainty and Offtake Agreements

The most critical factor is cash flow predictability. XPCL has firm, long-term Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) with sovereign-backed offtakers — EGAT (Thailand) and EDL (Laos):

  • EGAT contract is denominated in USD and THB, aligning with the debt profile and providing a currency hedge.
  • The fixed price eliminates exposure to merchant electricity markets.
  • The PPA includes mechanisms for managing underperformance due to hydrology risks, including “drought year” designation and energy carryforward.

This reduces market risk and enhances the credit quality of the project.

2. Hydrology and Operational Risk

Hydropower introduces volume risk tied to natural river flow. XPCL is a run-of-river plant, which is less controllable than reservoir-based dams. Lenders consider:

  • Historical hydrology data and predictive modeling
  • Impact of upstream dams (e.g., China’s dam cascade on the Mekong)
  • Mitigation through operational reserves and insurance

Fitch assessed XPCL’s revenue risk as “Midrange” due to limited long-term hydrological certainty. From a lender's view, this requires:

  • Higher equity cushion
  • More conservative DSCR targets
  • Possibly, debt sculpting to match expected generation variability

3. Construction and Technology Risk

For greenfield projects, construction risk is often the top concern. XPCL’s construction phase is complete (COD in 2019), and it uses proven Kaplan turbine technology—mitigating technical risk.

During initial funding, lenders typically required:

  • Completion guarantees from sponsors or EPC contractors
  • Covenants for delay damages and cost overruns
  • Independent engineer sign-offs before disbursements

Now, for refinancing or expansion loans, this risk has largely abated.

4. Sovereign and Political Risk

Operating in Laos introduces sovereign risk, especially in terms of:

  • Currency convertibility and transferability
  • Legal regime enforcement
  • Political stability

XPCL has mitigated these through:

  • Holding offshore accounts in Thailand to ring-fence revenue
  • Having EGAT as the majority offtaker
  • A concession agreement that includes legal protections and compensation clauses

These arrangements enabled agencies like Fitch to rate XPCL above the Lao sovereign ceiling, which is rare.

Lenders may still hedge residual risk via:

  • Political Risk Insurance (PRI) from MIGA, OPIC, or other multilaterals
  • Structuring loans in Thai baht or USD, minimizing local currency exposure
  • Including international arbitration clauses in financing documents

5. Capital Structure and Debt Profile

XPCL’s debt profile includes:

  • Secured, amortizing bank loans in USD and THB
  • Unsecured, fixed-rate debentures in THB with bullet maturities (2028–2030)
  • Green bond issuances with BBB+ rating (TRIS), appealing to ESG-focused investors

Lenders structuring large loans would assess:

  • Debt maturity profile and refinancing risk
  • DSCR and LLCR (Loan Life Coverage Ratio) under both base and stress scenarios
  • Leverage ratios and headroom under existing financial covenants

XPCL’s indicative metrics:

  • Base-case DSCR: 1.20x
  • Stress-case DSCR: 1.15x
  • Tail period: 17+ years beyond debt maturity

These figures are acceptable for a B+/BB- rated project, assuming other mitigants are in place.

๐Ÿงฉ Legal and Regulatory Framework

For cross-border project finance, a stable legal structure is essential. XPCL benefits from:

  • 30+ year concession agreement with the Lao government
  • Clear and enforceable tariff-setting mechanisms
  • Use of offshore Thai legal jurisdictions for dispute resolution
  • Compliance with environmental permits and Mekong River Commission agreements

Lenders must validate:

  • Full compliance with environmental and social safeguards
  • Legal enforceability of contracts and security interests
  • Clear remedies for termination, expropriation, or regulatory change

๐ŸŒฑ ESG and Sustainability Lens

ESG considerations increasingly impact loan pricing and investor appetite. XPCL’s green bond issuance in 2023 illustrates:

  • Strong investor demand for sustainable energy projects
  • Credibility in managing environmental risks like sediment flow and fish migration
  • Access to ESG-aligned capital and improved borrowing terms

Lenders aiming for green loan certification can use XPCL’s performance benchmarks to align with international frameworks and access concessional or blended finance options.

Case Study: XPCL and Large Corporate Loan Structuring

Xayaburi Power Company Limited (XPCL) offers a model project structure for large-scale financing in emerging markets. The company operates a 1,285MW run-of-river hydropower plant on the Mekong River, exporting electricity primarily to Thailand's EGAT under a long-term power purchase agreement (PPA).

Using a blend of project finance techniques, XPCL accessed international and local capital markets to secure funding. The financial model focused on a debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) of 1.20x under base scenarios, and 1.15x under stressed conditions—both considered acceptable for a B+/BB- rated infrastructure project.

The chart below illustrates XPCL’s DSCR projections over the life of its refinancing program from 2025 to 2032:

Even under stressed hydrology scenarios, XPCL maintains a DSCR above the critical 1.10x threshold. The 17-year tail period after debt maturity provides lenders with confidence in long-term repayment capacity.

In conclusion, XPCL demonstrates how hydropower projects in sovereign risk environments like Laos can still attract large corporate loans through robust structuring, political risk mitigation, and predictable revenue from cross-border energy trade.

๐Ÿ“Œ Related Services to Explore

๐Ÿ” Project Readiness Consulting
Investor-ready business plans, ESG reports, and feasibility documentation.
๐Ÿ‘‰ How to prepare Investor-ready business ? Learn More
๐Ÿ’ก Virtual CFO for Capital Raising
Modeling, pitch decks, and investor strategy for PE, VC, and DFIs.
๐Ÿ“ˆ Explore CFO Services
๐ŸŒฟ ESG is part of Financing Strategy
Align projects with green finance frameworks and institutional capital.
๐Ÿ“˜ Explore ESG Advisory